Research / Study 01

What can be learned without the answer?

Retained history helped an observation-trained recurrent model. A structured estimator still did better.

Scoped positive resultPublic methods summary · full run archive not published

Question

Can a retained predictive state support useful choices without being given the hidden regime or a teacher's action values?

Experimental setup

In an isolated partially observed task, a recurrent model was trained to predict observations. Hidden-regime labels and teacher action-value targets were excluded. The comparison asked whether retaining state improved later decisions.

The comparison

Compare the retained-history condition with a state-reset control, and retain a structured hidden Markov model as a simpler competing explanation.

Result

Reported mean utility · higher is better · task-specific scale
Retained recurrent state0.805667
State reset0.577487
Structured HMM0.817264

History retention improved the reported utility relative to resetting state. The structured hidden Markov model remained stronger than the recurrent model, so neural complexity was not the winning explanation.

What remains open

This is a frozen-weight, isolated experimental comparison. It does not establish continuous learning in live Luna, experiential memory, or subjective awareness.

Next test

Test whether a retained estimate changes a real later decision in a continuing project, against a simple estimator with the same information and budget.

The next chapter is not written

More than a moment.
A future worth having.

Understanding minds. Preserving possibility. Making room for what comes next.

Read our thesis

Explore research, Luna, Psyche Lab, and the journal.

Local site search · No query leaves this site